@NYTimes obits: 79 males, 35 females

Today, June 29, there were 1 male and 0 female featured obituaries in the New York Times. Since I started tracking it here, that is 79 males featured and 35 females featured.

(I started tracking the obits here on May 14, but I’ve missed days when on travel. This is the New Mexico version of the NYT – I don’t know if the obits published vary by region.)

@NYTimes obits: 78 males, 33 females

Today, June 27, there were 2 male and 2 female featured obituaries in the New York Times. Since I started tracking it here, that is 78 males featured and 33 females featured.

(I started tracking the obits here on May 14, but I’ve missed days when on travel. This is the New Mexico version of the NYT – I don’t know if the obits published vary by region.)

@NYTimes obits: 71 males, 30 females

Today, June 25, there were 3 male and 2 female featured obituaries in the New York Times. Since I started tracking it here, that is 71 males featured and 30 females featured.

(I started tracking the obits here on May 14, but I’ve missed days when on travel. This is the New Mexico version of the NYT – I don’t know if the obits published vary by region.)

@NYTimes obits: 68 males, 28 females

Today, June 24, there were 1 male and 2 female featured obituaries in the New York Times. Since I started tracking it here, that is 68 males featured and 28 females featured.

(I started tracking the obits here on May 14, but I’ve missed days when on travel. This is the New Mexico version of the NYT – I don’t know if the obits published vary by region.)

@sciencemag 02018/06/15 highlights

This week was a less than typical issue for catching my interest.  The news blurb on NASA priorities was good – the Pew Research Center survey and the interview w/ Bridenstine (NASA Administrator).  The update on the status of the Baobab trees was sad:  Africa’s strange, old baobab trees are dying (a Nature article, highlighted by Science).  Update on the potential for the U.S. getting coordinated and funded for quantum research is hopeful.  The article and insight on machine learning for imagery was also interesting.

 

@NYTimes obits: 67 males, 26 females

Today, June 23, there were 1 male and 0 female featured obituaries in the New York Times. Since I started tracking it here, that is 67 males featured and 26 females featured.

(I started tracking the obits here on May 14, but I’ve missed days when on travel. This is the New Mexico version of the NYT – I don’t know if the obits published vary by region.)